In this study, it is discussed how Māturīdī understood and interpreted the story of Prophet Mūsā and the Pious Servant from a theological point of view in his commentary called Ta'wīlāt al-Qur'ān. As a result of the literature review, there was no thesis in which any story in the Qur'ān was handled from a theological point of view, especially in the context of Māturīdī. In the articles on the subject, it has been seen that either a subject discussed in the stories is taken as a basis or it is limited from the whole of the story. According to Māturīdī, this study differs from other studies in that it is more comprehensive in terms of dealing with the theological aspect of the story of Prophet Mūsā and the Pious Servant. Content analysis method, one of the qualitative research techniques, was used in the study. As a result of the research, it has been determined that the story of Prophet Mūsā and the Pious Servant contains many theological issues and Māturīdī expressed his own views on this occasion. In the story of Prophet Mūsā - the Pious Servant, Māturīdī tries to determine the messages contained in the story on the one hand, and on the other hand, he makes inferences that are compatible with his own kalām system. We can list the theological subtleties that can be better understood when Māturīdī's understanding of kalām is examined in a holistic way as follows: According to Māturīdī, in the story of Prophet Mūsā - the Pious Servant, the young man's comparison of forgetting to the devil should be considered as a metaphor. According to Māturīdī, in the story of Prophet Mūsā - the Pious Servant, the devil's making the young man forget to remind the fish should be considered as a metaphor. Based on the dialogue between Prophet Mūsā and the Pious Servant before they set out on the journey together, he makes a few evaluations about the use of the word inshāllāh. It is as if Māturīdī is giving the message that our words and deeds should reflect our faith with this approach. Although Māturīdī does not make a clear statement about the identity of the Pious Servant, his insinuation that he may be a prophet can be interpreted as the fact that the story was not evaluated by Māturīdī on the basis of nubuwwat-walāyat. Naturally, the discussion of the superiority of the nabī and the walī is not included in the story. According to Māturīdī, if a student sees some ugly and unfair behavior in his teacher, he should not receive knowledge from his teacher from that moment on, as the Prophet Mūsā did, and should leave. Because the main thing is to live in accordance with the Qur'ān and Sunnah and to have direction. According to him, the Pious Servant did not kill the child spontaneously, but by Allah's command. Therefore, this issue should not be overlooked. The killing of the child may be related to Allāh's testing of human beings with certain things, or the killing of the child may be seen as a blessing and bestowal of Allāh. According to Māturīdī, the flow gives the impression that the story has a historical reality. However, it is also possible to come across symbolic messages in the story. * This study is based on the master's thesis titled “Māturīdī's Interpretation of Parables and His Approach to Parables about Faith” prepared under the supervision of Dr. Abdullah Demir.