Oku Okut Yayınları, kitabın yayım ve dağıtım hakkını saklı tutar. Ticari kullanım için yayınevine başvurulması gerekir.
Pantheism and the Problem of Evil
Panteizm ve Kötülük Problemi
Pantheism is a broad and multifaceted philosophical and religious worldview that asserts the identity of God and nature. It lacks a single, universally accepted definition. Throughout history, pantheistic elements have appeared in various Eastern and Western philosophical and religious traditions, and the system was particularly developed and formalized by philosophers such as Spinoza. In pantheism, God is not considered separate from the universe; rather, God is viewed as identical with nature and existence itself. Accordingly, concepts such as unity, immanence, monism, and determinism are central to pantheistic thought.
Although pantheism is sometimes perceived as akin to theism, it fundamentally differs by rejecting the notion of God as a being endowed with will, knowledge, and power. In the context of the problem of evil, pantheism offers explanations that diverge significantly from theistic interpretations.
The problem of evil centers on the question of how the existence of evil can be reconciled with the existence of God. Within theism, this problem poses a challenge to God’s goodness, omnipotence, and justice. In pantheism, however, the issue is addressed differently, since God is not a personal or volitional being. One of the most fundamental criticisms of pantheism relates to its monistic structure: the identification of God with nature implies that evils are inherent within God or God's nature, potentially rendering God "evil." Another significant criticism is pantheism’s commitment to determinism, which denies the existence of free will and thereby undermines the basis for human moral responsibility.
Pantheists such as Spinoza regard good and evil as relative constructs, arising from human cognition and ignorance. From this perspective, evil is merely a label assigned by humans to certain events based on their perceived self-interest, and it lacks objective reality. The universe operates according to laws of necessity; everything occurs as it must. Consequently, free will is considered an illusion, and neither humans nor God can act otherwise. This deterministic view raises serious questions about the possibility of moral accountability.
The pantheistic notion that evil is merely an illusion has been subject to several philosophical critiques. First, it is argued that the theory is internally inconsistent. If evil is unreal, then the illusion that conceals the pure and untainted goodness of everything must itself be regarded as a form of evil—thus, evil would exist. This means the claim that evil is unreal implies its own falsity. Secondly, the pantheistic view is said to contradict common human experience. The claim that evil is an illusion appears counterintuitive when confronted with real-life tragedies. For instance, it is clearly unreasonable to suggest to a grieving mother who lost her child in an earthquake that her suffering is merely illusory. A third critique concerns the undermining of moral foundations. Denying the existence of evil is sometimes described as the worst possible moral claim, as the pantheistic view, by failing to distinguish between good and evil, effectively erases the basis of moral values. Lastly, critics argue that pantheism renders worship and religious devotion meaningless. While pantheism allows for reverence toward nature or the divine unity, it excludes any personal relationship with God, such as prayer, worship, or divine-human interaction.
Panteizm, Tanrı ile doğanın özdeş olduğunu savunan hem dinî hem felsefi yönleri bulunan, tek bir tanımı olmayan geniş ve çok yönlü bir düşünce sistemidir. Tarih boyunca Doğu ve Batı’daki çeşitli felsefelerde ve dinlerde panteist unsurlar görülmüş, özellikle Spinoza gibi filozoflar tarafından sistematik hâle getirilmiştir. Panteizmde Tanrı evrenden ayrı düşünülmediği gibi Tanrı’nın, doğa ve evrenin kendisi olduğu düşünülür. Bu bağlamda panteizmde birlik, içkinlik, monizm ve determinizm gibi kavramlar ön plandadır.
Panteizm zaman zaman teizme yakın görülse de Tanrı’nın irade, bilgi ve kudret sahibi bir varlık olarak kabul edilmemesi, onu teizmden ayırır. Kötülük problemi bağlamında panteizm, teistik anlayıştan farklı açıklamalar sunar.
Kötülük problemi, özellikle Tanrı’nın varlığı ile kötülüğün nasıl bağdaştırılabileceği sorusunu içerir. Bu sorun teizmde, Tanrı’nın iyiliği, kudreti ve adaletiyle çelişen bir mesele olarak görülürken; panteizmde bu durum, farklı bir biçimde ele alınır çünkü panteizmde Tanrı, zat ve irade sahibi bir varlık değildir. Panteizme yöneltilen en temel eleştiri onun monist yapısıdır. Buna göre, Tanrı ve doğanın özdeşliği, kötülüklerin doğrudan Tanrı’da veya doğasında yer alması anlamına gelir ve bu Tanrı’yı “kötü” kılabilir. Diğer bir eleştiri ise onun determinizmi savunmasıdır. Bu düşünce temelde özgür iradeye yer vermediği için insanın ahlaki eylemlerinden sorumlu tutulamamasına yol açar.
Spinoza gibi panteistler, iyi ve kötüyü insan zihninin ve bilgisizliğinin ürünü olan göreli kavramlar olarak görür. Ona göre kötülük, evrendeki olaylara insanın kendi çıkarı açısından verdiği bir isimden ibarettir ve nesnel bir gerçekliği yoktur. Evren, zorunluluk yasalarına göre işler; her şey olması gerektiği gibi olur. Bu durumda özgür irade de bir illüzyondur ve dolayısıyla insan ve Tanrı “başka türlü davranamaz.” Bu determinist yaklaşım, insanın ahlaki sorumluluğunu da sorgulatır.
Panteist düşüncenin kötülüğün illüzyon olduğu teorisine bazı eleştiriler yapılmıştır. İlk olarak, teorinin kendi içinde çelişkili olduğu söylenebilir. Buna göre, eğer kötülük gerçek değilse o zaman her şeyin hakiki ve bozulmamış iyiliğini bizden saklayan yanılsamanın (illüzyon) kendisi de kesinlikle bir kötülük olarak görülmelidir ki bu durumda, kötülük gerçektir. Burada kötülüğün gerçek dışı olduğu tezi, kendi yanlışlığını ima eder. Bir diğer eleştiri ise, panteist teorinin genel tecrübelere aykırı olmasıdır. Kötülüğe ilişkin bu iddia gerçek hayatta yaşadığımız ya da karşılaştığımız durumları göz önüne aldığımızda sezgilere aykırı görünmektedir. Mesela, aklı başında bir kimsenin açlıktan veya şiddetli bir depremde göçük altından çocuğu ölen bir anneye aslında bunun bir illüzyon olduğunu söylemesinin zor olduğu açıktır. Üçüncü bir eleştiri ise ahlaki eylemlerin temelini sarstığı şeklindedir. Kötülüğün olmadığını söylemenin söylenecek en kötü şey olduğu iddia edilir. İyi ve kötüyü birbirinden ayırmayan panteist düşüncenin nihayetinde değerlerin ayrımını da ortadan kaldırdığı açık bir şekilde görünür. Son eleştiri ise ibadetleri anlamsız hâle getirmesidir. Panteist düşüncede, Doğa’ya veya ilahi Birliğe saygı gösterilmesine olanak sağlanırken ibadete, duaya veya Tanrı ile insan arasındaki herhangi bir kişisel ilişkiye yer olmadığı açıktır.
Adams, Marilyn McCord. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. London: Cornell University Press, 2000.
Adams, Robert M. - Marilyn M. Adams. “Introduction”. The Problem of Evil. ed. Marilyn M. Adams -Robert M. Adams. 1-4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Affifi, A. E. Muhyiddin İbnu’l-Arabi’nin Tasavvuf Felsefesi. çev. Mehmet Dağ. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1975.
Aiken, Henry D. “God and Evil: A Study of Some Relations between Faith and Morals”. Ethics 68/2 (1958), 77-97.
Allan, Leslie. The Problem of Evil. Erişim 06.19.2021.
https://www.rationalrealm.com/philosophy/metaphysics/problem-of-evil.html
Alston, William P. “The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition”. Philosophical Perspectives 5 (1991), 29-67.
Angier, Tom P. S. “Introduction”. The History of Evil in Antiquity: 2000 Bce to 450 Ce. ed. Tom P. S. Angier. C. 1. 1-10. London: Routledge, 2018.
Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 1969.
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Arıcan, Musa Kazım. Panteizm, Ateizm ve Panenteizm Bağlamında Spinoza’nın Tanrı Anlayışı. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2004.
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theolagiae. İng. çev. Thomas Gilby O. P. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1967.
Armstrong, A. H. The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.
Ateş, Aydan. Sadrettin Konevî’nin Muhyiddin İbnü’l Arabî ile Münasebetinde Metafizik Bir Problem Olan Varlığın Birliği (Vahdet-i Vücûd) Doktrini ile Panteizmin Karşılaştırılması. Kırıkkale: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2019.
Aydın, Mehmet S. Din Felsefesi. Ankara: Selçuk Yayınları, ts.
Aydın, Mehmet S. “Süreç (Proses) Felsefesi Işığında Tanrı - Âlem İlişkisi”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 27 (1985), 31-87.
Barnard, G. William. Exploring Unseen Worlds: William James and the Philosophy of Mysticism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.
Bayle, Pierre. “Spinoza”. Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. İng. çev. Richard H. Popkin. 288-338. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1965.
Beki, Münteha. Tanrı ve Mükemmellik. Ankara: İlahiyat, 2022.
Birgül, Osman Gazi. “Spinoza’ya Dair Panenteist ve Panteist Kategorizasyonlar”. Ethos: Felsefe ve Toplumsal Bilimlerde Diyaloglar 1/12 (2019), 132-149.
Bishop, John -Ken Perszyk. “Concepts of God and Problems of Evil”. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. ed. Andrei A. Buckareff - Yujin Nagasawa. 106-127. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Bishop, John -Ken Perszyk. “The Divine Attributes and Non-personal Conceptions of God”. Topoi 36/4 (2017), 609-621.
Bixler, Julius Seelye. Religion in the Philosophy of William James. Boston: Marshall Jones Company, 1926.
Buckareff, Andrei A. Pantheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Buckareff, Andrei A. Yujin Nagasawa. “Introduction: Alternative Conceptions of Divinity and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion”. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. 1-18. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Butterfield, Jeremy. “Determinism and Indeterminism”. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. C. 3. ed. E. Craig. London: Routledge, 1998.
Calder, Todd. “Evil”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concept-evil/. Erişim 17.05.2019.
Campbell, Ronnie P. Mere Christian Theism and the Problem of Evil: Toward A Trinitarian Perichoretic Theodicy. Lynchburg: Liberty University, Doktora Tezi, 2015.
Campbell, Ronnie P. Worldviews and the Problem of Evil: A Comparative Approach. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2019.
Cevizci, Ahmet. “Determinizm”. Büyük Felsefe Sözlüğü. 530-531. İstanbul: Say Yayınları, 2017.
Cevizci, Ahmet. “Yanılsama”. Büyük Felsefe Sözlüğü. 1966. İstanbul: Say Yayınları, 2017.
Chittick, W. C. Ibn al-‘Arabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination: The Sufi Path to Knowledge. New York: State University of the New York Press, 1989.
Clayton, Philip. “Panentheisms East and West”. Sophia 49 (2010), 183–191.
Coleman, Sam. “Personhood, Consciousness, and God: How To Be a Proper Pantheist”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85/1 (2019), 77–98.
Copleston, Frederick. A History of Philosophy. C. 4. London: Search Press, 1976.
Corrington, Robert S. “Deep Pantheism”. Journal for the Study of Religion 1/4 (2007), 503-507.
Corrington, Robert S. Deep Pantheism: Toward a New Transcendentalism. London: Lexington Books, 2015.
Corrington, Robert S. “Ecstatic Naturalism and Deep Pantheism”. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 8/2 (2014), 139-155.
Culp, John. “Panentheism”. The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/panentheism/. Erişim 11.01.2020.
Curley, Edwin M. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.
Dahlstrom, Daniel. “Moses Mendelssohn”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mendelssohn/. Erişim 02.11.2021.
Davies, Brian. Din Felsefesine Giriş. çev. Fatih Taştan. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayıncılık, 2011.
Davies, Brian. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. New York: Continuum, 2006.
Davies, Paul. The Cosmic Blueprint: New Discoveries in Nature’s Creative Ability to Order the Universe. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2004.
Davies, Paul. “Teleology without Teleology: Purpose through Emergent Complexity”. In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World. ed. Philip Clayton - Arthur Peacocke. 98-108. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004.
Deleuze, Gilles. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. İng. çev. Martin Joughin. New York: Zone Books, 1992.
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. İng. çev. Robert Hurley. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1988.
Denkel, Arda. Denkel, Arda.Nesne ve Özellik. İstanbul: Doruk Yayımcılık, 2008.
Denkel, Arda. Bilginin Temelleri. İstanbul: Doruk Yayıncılık, 2011.
Dix, Morgan. Lectures on the Pantheistic Idea of an Impersonal - Substance - Deity, as Contrasted with the Christian Faith Concerning Almighty God. New York: Hurd and Houghton, 1864.
Eddy, Mary Baker. Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. Boston: Christian Science Board of Directors, 1971.
Eddy, Mary Baker. Christian Science versus Pantheism. Boston: The Trustees under the Will of Mary Baker G. Eddy. 1898.
Eddy, Mary Baker. Unity of Good. Boston: Allison V. Stewart, 1912.
Edge, John Martin. God and the Human Condition of Suffering. Birmingham: Birmingham University, Doktora Tezi, 2021.
Ellis, George F. R. “Physics Ain’t What It Used to Be”. Nature 438 (2005), 739-40.
Erdem, Engin. “Kötülük Problemi”. Din Felsefesi. ed. Recep Kılıç, 304-326. Ankara: Ankuzem Yayınları, 2013.
Erdem, Hüsameddin. Bir Tanrı-Âlem Münasebeti Olarak Panteizm ve Vahdet-i Vücûd. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1990.
Effingham, Nikk. “The CaML Model of Pantheism”. Religious Studies 57/4 (2021), 575-596.
Faber, Roland. The Divine Manifold. London: Lexington Books, 2014.
Fechner, Gustav Theodor. Religion of a Scientist. İng. çev. Walter Lowrie. New York: Pantheon Books, 1946.
Feinberg, Paul D. “Pantheism”. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. ed. Walter A. Elwell. 886- 888. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2001.
Flint, Robert. Anti-Theistic Theories. London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1877.
Frame, John. Apologetics to the Glory of God. Philipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1994.
Freud, Sigmund. The Future of an Illusion. İng. çev. ve ed. James Strachey. 5-57. New York: W. Norton & Company Inc, 1961.
Ford, Lewis S. “Pantheism vs. Theism: A Re-Appraisal”. The Monist 80/2 (1997), 286-306.
Ford, Marcus P. “Pluralistic Pantheism?”, The Philosophy 17/2 (1979), 155-161.
Forrest, Peter. “The Personal Pantheist Conception Of God”. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. ed. A. Buckareff - Y. Nagasawa. 21-40. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Forrest, Peter - Roman Majeran. “Pantheism”. Roczniki Filozoficzne 64/4
Frankenberry, Nancy. “Pantheism”. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion. ed. J. Wentzel Vrede van Huyssteen. 645-646. New York: Thomson- Gale, 2003.
Gaskin, John Charles Addison. The Quest for Eternity: An Outline of the Philosophy of Religion. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984.
Gaskin, John Charles Addison. Varieties of Unbelief: From Epicurus to Sartre. ed. Paul Edwards, J. C. A. Gaskin, New York: Macmillan, 1989.
Garrett, Jan. “An Introduction to Pantheism”.
https://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/panthesm.htm. Erişim 18.04.2020.
Garvie, Alfred Ernest. “Pantheism (Greek and Roman)”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. ed. James Hastings. C. 9. 613-617. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1910.
Geach, Peter T. “Good and Evil”. Analysis 17/2 (1956), 33-42.
Geisler, Norman L. “Determinism”. Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics. 32-35. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1999.
Geisler, Norman L. If God, Why Evil?: A New Way to Think About the Question. Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2011.
Geisler, Norman L. “Illusion”. Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics. 611-612. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1999.
Geisler, Norman L. “Pantheism”. Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics. 1013-1018. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1999.
González, Justo L. “Predeterminism”. Essential Theological Terms. 139. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.
Griffin, David Ray. “Process Philosophy of Religion”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 50/1-3(2001), 131-151.
Griffin, David Ray. “Divine Persuation Rather than Coercion”. The Problem of Evil Selected Readings. ed. Michael L. Peterson. 288-300. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2017.
Griffin, David Ray. God, Power and Evil: A Process Theodicy. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.
Grula, John W. “Pantheism Reconstructed: Ecotheology as a Successor to the Judeo-Christian, Enlightenment, and Postmodernist Paradigms”. Zygon 43/1 (2008), 159-180.
Harris, E. E. The Substance of Spinoza. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1995.
Harrison, Paul. Elements of Pantheism: A Spirituality of Nature and the Universe. Lexington: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013.
Harrison, Paul. “World Pantheism Movement”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. ed. Bron Taylor. C. 2. 1769-1770. New York: Continuum International, 2005.
Harrison, Paul. “Toland: The Father of Modern Pantheism”.
https://carboneria.it/tolandeng.htm. Erişim 13. 05. 2020.
Harrison, Paul. “Pantheism”. https://www.pantheism.net/paul/faqs.htm. Erişim 06.02.2019.
Harrison, Paul. “Frequently Asked Questions about Scientific Pantheism”.
https://www.pantheism.net/paul/faqs.htm, Erişim 06.02.2019.
Hartshorne, Charles. A Natural Theology for Our Time. Illinois: Open Court Publishing, 1989.
Hartshorne, Charles. Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1984.
Hartshorne, Charles - William L. Reese. Philosophers Speak of God. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
Hasker, William. “On Regretting the Evils of this World”. The Problem of Evil: Selected Readings. ed. Michael L. Peterson. 153-165. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.
Hegel, G. W. F. Lectures on History of Philosophy. İng. çev. E. S. Haldane -Frances H. Simson. C. 3. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1995.
Helm, Paul. “Reviewed Work(s): Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity by Michael P. Levine”. Philosophy 70/271 (1995), 129-131.
Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1974.
Hick, John. Philosopy of Religion. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1990.
Hittell, John Shertzer. A Plea for Panteism. New York: Calvin Blanchard, 1857.
Hoffman, Joshua - Gary S. Rosenkrantz. The Divine Attributes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
Hospers, John. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. 1956.
Howard-Snyder, Daniel. “Introduction: The Evidential Argument From Evil”. The Evidential Argument from Evil. ed. Daniel Howard-Snyder. xı-xx. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.
Howison, G. H. “Is Modern Science Pantheistic?”. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19/4 (1885), 363-384.
Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. New York: Hafner Press, 1948.
Hume, David. Din Üstüne. çev. Mete Tunçay. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları,1995.
İsi, Hasan. “Tantrik Türk Budizmi’nde Mantra ve Dhāraṇī Kavramları Üzerine”. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi 9/2 (2020), 500-514.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. Tao-culuk'daki Anahtar Kavramlar. çev. Ahmed Yüksel Özemre. İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları, 2003.
James, William. A Pluralistic Universe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1996.
Jantzen, Grace. God’s World, God’s Body. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1984.
Journet, Charles. The Meaning of Evil. İng. çev. Michael Barry, London: Geoffrey Chapman Ltd., 1963.
Kamal, Muhammad. “Spinoza and Relativity of Evil in the World”. Open Journal of Philosophy 8/3 (2018), 145-155.
Kamal, Muhammad. “Ibn‘Arabi and Spinoza on God and the World”. Open Journal of Philosophy 7/4 (2017), 409-421.
Kane, G. Stanley. “The Failure of Soul-Making Theodicy”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6/1 (1975), 1–22.
Kane, G. Stanley. “Evil is Privation”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11/1 (1980), 43-58.
Kekes, John. “Evil”. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ed. Edward Craig. C.2. 2608-2611. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Kekes, John. The Roots of Evil. New York: Cornell University Press, 2005.
Keşan, Fatih. Spinoza’nın Tanrı ve Özgür İrade Anlayışı. Iğdır: Iğdır Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2023.
Kiraz, Erol. Bir Din Felsefesi Problemi Olarak İbn Arabi’de Kötülük Problemi ve Teodise. Sivas: Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2013.
Latzer, Michael. “Leibniz’s Conception of Metaphysical Evil”. Journal of the History of Ideas 55/1 (1994), 1-15.
Lenoir, Frederic. Spinoza Mucizesi. çev. Aslı Sümer. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları, 2019.
Leslie, J. A. Infinite Minds: A. Philosophical Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
Levine, Michael P. “Pantheism”. A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. ed. Charles Taliaferro vd. 337-347. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Levine, Michael P. “Pantheism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/pantheism/ (Erişim 20.05.2020).
Levine, Michael P. Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity. London: Routledge, 1994.
Levine, Michael P. “Pantheism, Theism and the Problem of Evil”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 35/3 (1994), 129-151.
Levine, Michael P. “Monism and Pantheism”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30/4 (1992), 95–110.
Lewis, C. S. The Problem of Pain. London: Fontana Books, 1957.
Livieri, Paolo. “Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/friedrich-jacobi/. Erişim 02.11.2021.
Lloyd, Genevieve. Routledge Philosophy Guide Book to Spinoza and The Ethics. London: Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks, 1996.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Pantheism”. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ed. Donald M. Borchert. C. 7. 94-99. New York: Thomson-Gale, 2006.
Mackie, John L. “Evil And Omnipotence”, Mind. 64/254 (1955). 200-212.
Madden, Edward H. - Peter H. Hare, Evil and the Concept of God. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1968.
Manafov, Rafiz. John Hick’in Din Felsefesinde Kötülük Problemi ve Teodise. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2007.
Mander, William J. “Pantheism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/pantheism/. Erişim 19.03.2021.
Mander, William J. “The Unreality of Evil”. Sophia 57/4 (2018), 249–264.
Mann, William E. “Emanationism”. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. ed. Robert Audi. 298-299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Margulis, Lynn - Dorion Sagan. Dazzle Gradually: Reflections on the Nature of Nature. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2007.
Martinich, Aloysius Patrick. “Pantheism”. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. ed. Robert Audi. 753. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Matson, Wallace I. The Existence of God. New York: Cornell University Press, 1965.
McClosky, Henry John. “God and Evil”. The Philosophical Quarterly 10/39 (1960), 97-114.
McIntyre, James Lewis. Giordano Bruno (1548-1600). London: Macmillan and Co., 1903.
McTaggart, John -Ellis McTaggart. Some Dogmas of Religion. London: Edward Arnold, 1906.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1/78 (2009), 17-82.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “A Concise Grammar of Pantheism”.
https://www.academia.edu/36909644/A_Concise_Grammar_of_Pantheism. Erişim 22. 11. 2020.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Cohen, Spinoza and the Nature of Pantheism”.
https://philarchive.org/archive/MELCSA-2. Erişim 20.07.2020.
Meister, Chad. Introducing Philosophy of Religion. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Mill, John Stuart. Three Essays on Religion. New York: Prometheus, 1998.
Misrahi, Robert. Spinoza Sözlüğü. çev. Ece Durmuş. İstanbul: Otonom Yayıncılık, 2019.
Morris. Thomas V. Our Idea of God. Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 1991.
Nadler, Steven M. Spinoza’nın Etika’sı. çev. Özgür Şahin. İstanbul: Say Yayıncılık, 2021.
Nadler, Steven M. “Spinoza in the Garden of Good and Evil”. The Problem of Evil in Early Modern Philosophy. ed. Elmar J. Kremer - Michael J. Latzer. 66-80. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001.
Naess, Arne. “The Deep Ecology Movement: Some Philosophical Aspects”. Selected Works of Arne Naess. ed. A. Drengson - H. Glasser. C. 10. 2291–2314. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
Nahum, Alber. “Sunuş”. Kötülük Mektupları. Benedictus Spinoza. çev. Alber Nahum. 7-46. İstanbul: Norgunk, 2008.
Nagasawa, Yujin. “Modal Panentheism”. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. ed. Andrei A. Buckareff -Yujin Nagasawa. 91-105. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Nagasawa, Yujin. “John Hick’s Pan(en)theistic Monism”. Religious Pluralism and the Modern World: An Ongoing Engagement with John Hick. ed. Sharada Sugirtharajah. 176–189. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Nagasawa, Yujin. “Multiverse Pantheism”. God and the Multiverse Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Perspectives. ed. Klaas J. Kraay. 177-191. London- New York: Routledge, 2015.
Needham, Joseph. Science and Civilisation in China. C. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956.
Neiman, Susan. Modern Düşüncede Kötülük. çev. Ayhan Sargüney. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2009.
Nejeschleba, Tomáš. “Pantheism, Renaissance”. Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. ed. Marco Sgarbi. 1-4. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018.
Nikkel, David H. “Panentheism”. Encyclopedia of Science and Religion. ed. J. Wentzel Vrede van Huyssteen. C. 1. 714-717. New York: Thomson- Gale, 2003.
Oakes, Robert. “Does Traditional Theism Entail Pantheism?”. American Philosophical Quarterly 20/1 (1983), 105-112.
Oppy, Graham. “Mereological Ontological Arguments and Pantheism”. Monist 80/2 (1997), 320–336.
Oppy, Graham. Arguing about Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Ostrowick, John. “A Scientific Model of Pantheism”. South African Journal of Philosophy 35/3 (2016), 302-316.
Otto, Rudolf. The Idea of the Holy. İng. çev. John W. Harvey. London: Oxford University Press, 1923.
Owen, H. P. Concept of Deity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1971.
Özden, H. Ömer - Osman Elmalı. İlkçağ Felsefesi Tarihi. İstanbul: Bilge Kültür Sanat Yayınları, 2017.
Özhan, Rana. Panteizm ve Panenteizm Tartışmaları Arasında Spinoza Felsefesi ve Sufi Metafiziği (Vahdet-İ Vücud). Mersin: Mersin Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2019.
Özlem, Doğan. Mantık. İstanbul: İnkılâp Yayınevi, 2004.
Pace, Edward A. “Pantheizm”. The Catholic Encyclopedia. C. 11. 447-450. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911.
Pailin, David A. God and the Processes of Reality: Foundations of a Credible Theism. London: Routledge, 1989.
Patterson, William R. “The Problem of Evil and Liberal Theologies”. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 24/2 (2016), 187–205.
Peterson, Michael L. God and Evil: An Introduction to the Issues. Colorado: Westview Press, 1998.
Peterson, Michael L. vd. Akıl ve İnanç: Din Felsefesine Giriş. çev. Rahim Acar. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2009.
Pfeifer, Karl. “Pantheism as Panpsychism”. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. ed. A. A. Buckareff - Y. Nagasawa. 41-49. New York: Oxfod University Press, 2016.
Picton, J. Allanson. Pantheism: its Story and Significance. London: Archibald Constable and Co. Ltd., 1905.
Pinsent, Andrew. “Introduction”. The History of Evil in the Medieval Age:450-1450. ed. Andrew Pinsent. 14-28. London: Routledge, 2018.
Pike, Nelson. “Hume on Evil” God and Evil: Readings on the Theological Problem of Evil. ed. Nelson Pike. 61-84. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1964.
Pitkänen, Olli. “Schelling’s Pantheism and the Problem of Evil”. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 78/4-5 (2017), 361-372.
Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom and Evil. London: George Allen & Unvin Ltd., 1974.
Plantinga, Alvin. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. London: Cornell University Press, 1967.
Plotinus. Enneadlar: Seçmeler. çev. Zeki Özcan. Bursa: Asa Kitabevi, 1996.
Plumptre, Constance E. General Sketch of the History of Pantheism. C. I. London: Samuel Deacon and Co., 1878.
Plumptre, Constance E. General Sketch of the History of Pantheism. C. II. London: Samuel Deacon and Co., 1879.
Potter, Karl. “Indian Philosophy”. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ed. Donald M. Borchert. C. 4. 623-634. New York: Thomson Gale, 2006.
Poussin, L. De La Vallee - Alfred Forke. “Philosophy”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. ed. James Hastings. C. 9. 844-885. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1917.
Quinn, Philip L. “Pantheism”. Oxford Companion to Philosophy. ed. Ted Honderich. 641. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Robinson, Daniel N. “Introduction”. The History of Evil in the Early Modern Age: 1450-1700. C. 3. 16-19. ed. Daniel N. Robinson vd. London: Routledge, 2018.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait. Tanrı’yı Bilmenin İmkânı ve Mahiyeti. Ankara: Kitâbiyât, 2004.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait. “Tanrı: Tasavvurları, Sıfatları ve Delilleri”. Din ve Ahlak Felsefesi. ed. Recep Kılıç. 21-72. Ankara: Ankuzem Yayınları, 2006.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait. “Ateizm ve Ateistik Deliller”. Din ve Ahlak Felsefesi. ed. Recep Kılıç. 111-146. Ankara: Ankuzem Yayınları, 2006.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait. “Varlık Felsefesi”. Felsefe. ed. Mehmet Bayrakdar. 103-138. Ankara: Ankuzem Yayınları, 2005.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait. “Oakes, Teizm ve Panteizm”. Din ve Felsefe Araştırmaları 3/6 (2020), 137-159.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait.“Bayle, Spinoza ve Panteizm Meselesi”. Din ve Felsefe Araştırmaları 3/5 (2020), 5-27.
Reese, William L. “Pantheism and Panentheism”. The New Encyclopædia Britannica.
https://academiceb.com.eres.qnl.qa/levels/collegiate/article/pantheism. Erişim 23.03.2021.
Richter, Burton. “Theory in Particle Physics: Theological Speculation versus Practical Knowledge”. Physics Today 59/10 (2006), 8-9.
Rocca, Michael Della. Spinoza. London & New York: Routledge, 2008.
Rosenthal, M. -P. Yudin. “İllüzyon”. Felsefe Sözlüğü. çev. Aziz Çalışlar. 231. İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları, 1997.
Rowe, William L. “Identity”. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. ed. Robert Audi. 415-416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism”. American Philosophical Quarterly 16/4 (1979), 335-341.
Rowe, William L. “Evil and Theodicy” Philosophical Topics 16/2 (1988), 119-132.
Rubenstein, Mary-Jane. Pantheologies: Gods, Worlds, Monsters. New York: Columbia University Press: 2018.
Russell, Bertrand. History of Western Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2000.
Russell, Bertrand. Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1919.
Russell, Bruce “The Persistent Problem of Evil”. Faith and Philosophy 6/2 (1989), 121-139.
Schaya, Leo Sufi Tevhid Öğretisi. çev. Mahmut Kanık. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2017.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. “A Few Words On Pantheism”. Essays from the Parerga and Paralipomena. çev. T. Bailey Saunders. 99-102. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1951.
Scruton, Roger. Spinoza: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Sessions, George. “The Deep Ecology Movement: A Review”. Forest History Society and American Society for Environmental History 11/2 (1987), 105-125.
Schaff, Philip. St. Augustin's City of God and Christian Doctrine. New York: The Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890.
Schaffer Jonathan. “Monism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/monism/. Erişim 17.06. 2020.
Siwek, Paul. “How Pantheism Resolves the Enigma of Evil”. Laval Theologique et Philosophique. 11/2 (1955), 213–221.
Smith, Quentin. “Conclusion: Naturalistic Pantheism”. Ethical and Religious Thought in Analytic Philosophy of Language. ed. Quentin Smith. 222-244. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
Spinoza, Benedictus. Etika. çev. Hilmi Ziya Ülken, Ankara: Dost Kitabevi, 2016.
Spinoza, Benedictus. “Ethics”. Spinoza: Complete Works. İng. çev. Samuel Shirley. Cambridge: Hackett, 2002.
Spinoza, Benedictus. Descartes Felsefesinin İlkeleri ve Metafizik Düşünceler. çev. Coşkun Şenkaya. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları, 2014.
Spinoza, Benedictus. Kısa İnceleme. çev. Emine Ayhan, Ankara: Dost Yayınları, 2015.
Spinoza, Benedictus. Mektuplar. çev. Emine Ayhan. Ankara: Dost Yayınları, 2014.
Sprigge, Timothy L. S. “Pantheism”. The Monist 80/2 (1997), 191-197.
Sprigge, Timothy L. The God of Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.
Stace, Walter T. Mistisizm ve Felsefe. çev. Abdüllatif Tüzer. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2004.
Stace, Walter T. Mysticism and Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1961.
Stace, Walter T. A Critical History of Greek Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1920.
Steinhart, Erick. “Pantheism and Current Ontology”. Religious Studies 40/1 (2004), 63-80.
Steinkraus, Warren E. Taking Religious Claims Seriously: A Philosophy of Religion. ed. Michael H. Mitias. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.
Stenmark, Mikael. “Panentheism and its Neighbors”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85/1 (2019), 23-41.
Suttle, Gary. “Pantheist Association for Nature”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. ed. Bron Taylor. C. 2. 1261. New York: Continuum International, 2005.
Swinburne, Richard. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Swinburne, Richard. “Natural Evil”. American Philosophical Quarterly 15/4 (1978), 295-301.
Swinburne, Richard. Is There A God?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Taylor, Bron. “Deep Ecology”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. ed. Bron Taylor. C. 1. 456-460. London: Continuum International, 2005.
Taylor, Richard. “Determinism”. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ed. Paul Edwards. C. 2. 359–373. New York: Crowell Collier and Macmillan, 1967.
Tharpa, Venerable Tenzin. Tibetan Buddhist Essentials: A Study Guide for the 21st Century. ed. Nalini Ramesh -Halley Haruta, Bylakuppe: Sera Jey Monastic University, 2018.
The Bhagavad Gita İng. çev. Easwaran, Eknath. Canada: Nilgiri Press, 2007.
Thilly, Frank. “Pantheism”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. ed. James Hastings. C. 9. 609-613. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1917.
Thomson, Ann. Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Thomson, J. Radford. “Pantheism”. A Dictionary Philosophy in the Words of Philosophers. ed. J. Radford. Thomson, 281-287. London: Reeves And Turner, 1887.
Trakakis, N. Nick. “Introduction”. The Problem of Evil: Eight Views in Dialogue. ed. N. Nick Trakakis. 1-11. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Toland, John. Pantheisticon. London: Garland, 1976.
Tooley, Michael. “The Problem of Evil”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/evil/. Erişim 08.09.2020.
Urquhart, William Swam. Pantheism and the Value of Life with Special Reference to Indian Philosophy. London: Epworth Press, 1919.
Topuz, Şükrü. İbn Arabî Metafiziğinde Kötülük Problemi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2019.
Tsanoff, Radoslav A. “Pantheism, Naturalism, and Personality”. New Mexico Quarterly 22/4 (1952), 452-457.
Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. İslâm Düşüncesi. Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2015.
Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. İslâm Felsefesi. Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2015.
Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. “Önsöz”. Etika. Benedictus de Spinoza. çev. Hilmi Ziya Ülken. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi, 2016.
Voltaire, W. F. F. “The Lisbon Earthquake”. New England Review 26/3 (2005), 183-193.
Wallace, Gerald. “The Problems of Moral and Physical Evil”. Philosophy 46/178 (1971), 295-301.
Wagner, Steven J. “Identity”. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. ed. Robert Audi. 415-416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Weber, Alfred. Felsefe Tarihi. çev. H. Vehbi Eralp. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1964.
Weidenbaum, Jonathan. “Why I am Not a Pantheist (Nor a Panentheist): Metaphysics, Totalization, and the Cosmos”.
http://www.metanexus.net/essay/why-i-am-not-pantheist-nor-panentheist. Erişim 09.11.2021.
Werner, Charles. Kötülük Problemi. çev. Sedat Umran. İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları, 2000.
Whelan, Ruth. “From Christian Apologetics to Enlightened Deism: The Case of Jacques Abbadie (1656–1727)”. Modern Language Review 87/1 (1992), 32–40.
Wieman, Henry Nelson. “Transendence and ‘Cosmic Consciousness”. Transcendence. ed. Herbert W. Richardson - Donald R. Cutler. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.
Williams, Paul - Anthony Tribe. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Wolfson, H. Austryn. The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning, C. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934.
Wolfson, H. Austryn. The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. C. 2. New York, Schocken Books, 1969.
Wood, Harold William Jr. “Universal Pantheist Society”. Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. ed. Bron Taylor. C. 2. 1683-1684. London: Continuum International, 2005.
Worman, J. H. “Pantheism”. Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature. ed. John McClintock - James Strong. C. 7. 616-624. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1896.
Yalcin, Martin O. “American Naturalism on Pantheism”. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 32/2 (2011), 156-179.
Yandell, Keith. “Pantheism”. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. C. 7. 202-205. ed. Edward Craig, 202-205. New York: Routledge,1998.
Yasa, Metin. Tanrı ve Kötülük. Ankara: Elis Yayınları, 2014.
Yıldız, İbrahim. Teizm ve Ateizm: Delilci Kötülük Problemi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2021.
Yiğit, Fevzi. Molla Sadra’nın Nedensellik Teorisi. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2018.
Zaleha, Bernard Daley. “The Only Paradise We Ever Need”: An Investigation into Pantheism’s Sacred Geography in The Writıngs of Edward Abbey, Thomas Berry, And Matthew Fox, and A Preliminary Survey of Signs of Emerging Pantheism in American Culture. Florida: Florida University, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2008.
The New World Encyclopedia (NWE). https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/pantheism (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2020).
Kaynakçada 280 eser yer almaktadır.
Daha Fazlası
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Oku Okut Yayınları
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Panteizm ve Kötülük Problemi
İndir
Yayın Bilgisi
-
Yayın TürüKitap
-
Yayım Tarihi23 Temmuz 2025
-
Dizi
-
Dizi No.1
-
Kategori
-
ISBN-10 (02)625-95679-5-2
-
ISBN-13 (15)978-625-95679-5-2
-
Date of first publication (11)23.07.2025
Bu kitapla ilgili ayrıntılar
Bu çalışmada kullanılan veriler, bilimsel ve etik kurallara uygun biçimde sınıflandırılmış, analiz edilmiş ve raporlanmıştır. Veriler, üçüncü kişi veya kurumlarla paylaşılmayacaktır.
Somuncuoğlu Erkan, Fatma. Panteizm Ve Kötülük Problemi. critical ed . Ankara: Oku Okut Yayınları, 2025. https://doi.org/10.55709/okuokutyayinlari.78
